|
Special Service Mustangs For Sale Any and all SSP Mustangs. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
Jim for the first time since 1998 there is only two left: 1984 Oregon SP unmarked 1986 Idaho SP |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
First year for the SSP???
__________________
Bernie 1993 FHP 813 1986 UHP SSP slicktop. 1993 Floyd Co Ga\Rome Ga pd SSP SOLD ![]() ![]() Even grief recedes with time, but we must Never Forget. 9-11-01 Mustang Club of America member. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
lol....yeh..
come on Bernie.....you gotta have some sort of hype to sell a car.... examples: "never in service" "prototype" "undercover drug work" "narcotics task force" "freeway pursuit" "first ssp" "last ssp" ![]()
__________________
Jim for the first time since 1998 there is only two left: 1984 Oregon SP unmarked 1986 Idaho SP |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I guess...It looks like a nice car. Is it me or does the interior color look off? He says it's sand beige but it looks darker.
__________________
Bernie 1993 FHP 813 1986 UHP SSP slicktop. 1993 Floyd Co Ga\Rome Ga pd SSP SOLD ![]() ![]() Even grief recedes with time, but we must Never Forget. 9-11-01 Mustang Club of America member. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The seller certainly picked up some bad info. The 406 number isn't correct for the number of SSPs in 82, and we proved that the 82's were in fact NOT 'Severe Service Package' Mustangs. They were 'Special Service Package' Mustangs from the beginning, as confirmed with an Eminger invoice on a 82 CHP Mustang.
This car's VIN (204017) is part of the same consecutive unit number block as two other known 84 CHP Mustangs.
__________________
Bill Jr. To everyone out there, wherever you are. Remember, the light at the end of the tunnel may be the police chasing you down in their own Mustang! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There was another 'restored' '84 wasn't there? I think it might belong to a member here in GA? The condition underhood makes me wonder what else was overlooked. And those poor door panels! Hopefully easy fixes. Regardless, looks great in b&w.
|
![]() |
|
|