1993 FHP on E-BAY

[NoDrama43]

I wasn't aware anyone had said the car was overpriced.......I don't fly .org so I guess I missed it.

werd

[hwneil]

Great thing about living in America! EVERYONE is entitled to there OPINION. Dont bash on somebody just for expressing it! My 2 cents worth....

[ImEvil1]

Originally Posted by hwneil

Great thing about living in America! EVERYONE is entitled to there OPINION. Dont bash on somebody just for expressing it! My 2 cents worth....

Who is bashing on somebody?

[hwneil]

Originally Posted by hwneil

Here is the Whole post by David on .org

My experience, preference and opinion on the 'most desirable':

Plus

1. 5 Speed......................3 Points
2. Marked, tu-tone State Agency.....2 Points
3. While I prefer 87-93....85-86 are very desirable to many. 1 Point 87-93
4. Service documentation...the more....the better. up to 3 Points
5. Low Availability of that Agency's car....1 Point

Minus

1. Single color cars 1 Point
2. Local/Federal Agency use 1 Point
3. Unmarked 1 point

Based on that I would rate a marked 87-93 CHP, FHP, TX with documentation and good availability 9
.....a marked GSP/NV a 10
.....marked monotone 5 spd an 7
.....unmarked auto a 6




IMO...the more categories of the above you cover with an SSP...the more it is worth. Yes..there are exceptions. My old GSP (Lisa Sams) was an AOD...but a restored GSP is RARE....and that color combo unique....and the best looking IMO. The NV car I am working on will probably fit into a similar category. Your EVOC car is in a class of its own. My old PA SSP was one of only 11 unmarked PA automatics used. I have owned a total of 16 SSP's and based the above on my experience, opinion, sales and preference. Ask youself...how easily and how long could you take to find or replace a particular car. Can you easily find another in a few months...or could it be years.

Lots of consideration needed and each persons preference will vary...but this is what I have found.......this is MY preference...not a rating standard for every SSP or everybody. Each person has their preference...this is mine and what I like.
__________________
David P.

Davids Opinion......

[ImEvil1]

Originally Posted by hwneil

Davids Opinion......

I personally find David's post (Last edited by DJP55 : Today at 08:18 PM.) humorous. If you feel that this was "bashing" then I'm sorry you feel that way. Like you said, this is America and we all have our opinions.

I deleted the triple post, so my apologies if the one above wasn't the one you meant to post.

[FHP813]

The problem with people expressing an opinion is someone else might have their own opinion that doesn't necessarily agree with yours. Disagreeing is not bashing. In MY OPINION.

[hwneil]

Computer illiterate.....Thanks for cleaning it up...Neil

[ImEvil1]

Originally Posted by NoDrama43

I wasn't aware anyone had said the car was overpriced.......I don't fly .org so I guess I missed it.

werd

I think "steep" was the word first used. There was talk of a replacement dash (this car has the original), FHP re-paint (FHP didn't re-paint anything in the '90s that I ever saw), etc. etc. etc.

The original "points"-post has now been edited, also.

Bottom line: It's a 93K original-mile FHP car. I can't remember the last time I saw an FHP car for sale that was as original as this one appears to be (with this kind of mileage).