Special Service Mustang.net Forums

Go Back   Special Service Mustang.net Forums > 1982-1986 Special Service Mustangs
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

1982-1986 Special Service Mustangs The 4-eyed cars.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 10-22-2011, 02:40 PM
ImEvil1's Avatar
ImEvil1 ImEvil1 is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FoxChassis View Post
Which DSO a car is ordered through has to do with the "region" (first digit) and "district" (second digit) that the ordering dealer is in. I don't know how Ford went about assigning dealers to which ever DSO they ended up.

I have ALWAYS seen that the first two digits in the dealer number is the DSO, that's why I thought it odd that the DSO on the door tags (actual and image) and the buck tag are 76 but the dealer number starts with 56. I thought that the dealer number would have started with 76 as well.
Dealer codes couldn't be the same as the DSO in many cases, because the DSO codes, like you mentioned above, are regional (districts).

From the DSO page here:

__________________

Mike

'82 SSP (Marketing Order)
'83 Colorado State Patrol #202
'83 Texas DPS
'85 Florida Highway Patrol #1422
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1187
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1363
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 10-22-2011, 04:11 PM
FoxChassis FoxChassis is offline
VIN guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,011
Default

I will have to go through all of the window stickers, invoices, reports again but if I remember correctly, this is the first time that the dealer code did not match the DSO. Granted, the documentation that I have seen is only but a very small percentage of total production.

When I say "region" and "district", that is what is on the build sheet. Put the two together and it's the same as the DSO.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 10-22-2011, 04:20 PM
GSPI GSPI is offline
...Gathering Parts
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: CLE
Posts: 659
Default

Again, this is how all of the Idaho fleet cars have been ordered from my research.

Here is the door tag for the recent Idaho car that was sold out of the Cleveland area:



...same thing. And here is the buck tag for that vehicle:



Hopefully that helps you guys out with your search for the answer to the Idaho mystery... more info when I finally dig out the build sheet.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 10-22-2011, 05:29 PM
ImEvil1's Avatar
ImEvil1 ImEvil1 is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FoxChassis View Post
I will have to go through all of the window stickers, invoices, reports again but if I remember correctly, this is the first time that the dealer code did not match the DSO. Granted, the documentation that I have seen is only but a very small percentage of total production.

When I say "region" and "district", that is what is on the build sheet. Put the two together and it's the same as the DSO.
I might be missing your point, but we have tons of documented cars with DSO codes from adjacent states, ie. Oregon cars with 74 DSOs. If the ordering dealer was in OR, as in these cases, then the dealer codes don't match the DSO code.
__________________

Mike

'82 SSP (Marketing Order)
'83 Colorado State Patrol #202
'83 Texas DPS
'85 Florida Highway Patrol #1422
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1187
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1363
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 10-22-2011, 06:29 PM
GSPI GSPI is offline
...Gathering Parts
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: CLE
Posts: 659
Default

I can always call the Denver sales office no?
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 10-22-2011, 08:00 PM
ImEvil1's Avatar
ImEvil1 ImEvil1 is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GSPI View Post
I can always call the Denver sales office no?
I doubt it!
__________________

Mike

'82 SSP (Marketing Order)
'83 Colorado State Patrol #202
'83 Texas DPS
'85 Florida Highway Patrol #1422
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1187
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1363
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 10-22-2011, 08:35 PM
GSPI GSPI is offline
...Gathering Parts
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: CLE
Posts: 659
Default

I have their telephone number...
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 10-22-2011, 08:37 PM
ImEvil1's Avatar
ImEvil1 ImEvil1 is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GSPI View Post
I have their telephone number...
Good luck with that. Let us know if they tell you anything good.
__________________

Mike

'82 SSP (Marketing Order)
'83 Colorado State Patrol #202
'83 Texas DPS
'85 Florida Highway Patrol #1422
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1187
'93 Florida Highway Patrol #1363
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 10-22-2011, 08:43 PM
GSPI GSPI is offline
...Gathering Parts
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: CLE
Posts: 659
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ImEvil1 View Post
Good luck with that. Let us know if they tell you anything good.
I aim to please... and find information!! I've gotten this far, might as well go "all out"!
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 10-22-2011, 09:13 PM
FoxChassis FoxChassis is offline
VIN guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ImEvil1 View Post
I might be missing your point, but we have tons of documented cars with DSO codes from adjacent states, ie. Oregon cars with 74 DSOs. If the ordering dealer was in OR, as in these cases, then the dealer codes don't match the DSO code.
I think you're misunderstanding what I'm saying.

Anyway, did find more where the DSO wasn't the same as the first part of the dealer number. Most of them are the same though.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.