Special Service Mustang.net Forums

Go Back   Special Service Mustang.net Forums > 1982-1986 Special Service Mustangs
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

1982-1986 Special Service Mustangs The 4-eyed cars.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-04-2012, 06:43 PM
HBWaterfowler's Avatar
HBWaterfowler HBWaterfowler is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: America
Posts: 32
Default

It looks like the 8.8 is basically a direct swap.
The break line can be used from the 7.5 on the 8.8, people say.
The 8.8 line will need to be extended, or v8 8.8 break lines can be swapped (really don't want to do this!).

My 7.5 came with quad shocks, first year.
Will a mustang with factory 7.5" rear that has quad shocks; Will the quad shocks fit on the 8.8? I have a 90 mustang in the garage (roommates) I can compair.
I'm not sure if I will be able to visually see.
I think I'll measure where the plate is mounted to the body, see if its in the same spot.
__________________
-SSP Alternative
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-04-2012, 11:43 PM
Mustang Kid's Avatar
Mustang Kid Mustang Kid is offline
Addicted to CHPs/SSPs
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Grants Pass, OR
Posts: 844
Default

You basically have the info for what you want.
Newer 87-93 suspension should bolt right in, might need a newer K member.
I do not believe SSP's had TRX suspension. One thing I do know that the TRX had was hopper bars.

Why do you want to swap to newer suspension and 5 lug? You basically kill the value of the car, even if you paint it black and white and add all the equipment. You wouldn't be able to use the original steel wheels for a correct look either.

Your 84 looks pretty nice. Running and driving, fairly original, I'd say you could get 2k out of it. I would not modify the car. 84's are one of the rarer years now, maybe less than 10 exist that are known? You could sell this car to someone who wants to restore it, and take that money and use it on a newer non SSP coupe. That's what I would do.

It is your car though, you can do as you wish. I just like to see these cars restored instead of modified.

Just the way I am. Your car is about the 6th 84 I've seen so far.
__________________

Sam-
1985 CHP #8337
CHP Motor Transport Mustangs
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-05-2012, 12:07 AM
HBWaterfowler's Avatar
HBWaterfowler HBWaterfowler is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: America
Posts: 32
Default

True.

But drum brakes are garbage. I've already had a few rear tire lockups when under heavy breaking. If anything it's a safety improvement.

I don't want to make the mustang a weekend show car, but get some use on the road and be seen.

If the car was still in service (the Highway Patrol doing the modifications) why wouldn’t they upgrade to rear discs? Not to mention the 87-93 suspension is a great improvement too.

But you bring up a major question I have in relation to this.
What kind of laws and problems would I face painting it black/white and having special service equipment in the car?
I would think cops would stop you often, and may even question your right to be driving the car?

I know the decals can be magnets and removed, but other then that it still looks like a cop car and could be seen as impersonation?

Maybe it can be registered as historical vehicle with no registration for life? Hell if I know.

Maybe someone can shed some light on that?
__________________
-SSP Alternative
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-05-2012, 09:38 AM
FoxChassis FoxChassis is offline
VIN guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,011
Default

There were "TR Handling Suspension" (through '84 for Mustang and '85 for Capri) and "Handling Suspension" (called "Special Handling" after '84)packages, and they included additonal items to, or replacement items in, the 'regular' suspension. One example of an "additional item" that the 'regular' suspension did not have but the TR and Handling packages did would be a rear stabilizer bar. The TR package was standard on the '79 Pace Car, '79-81 Cobra, '81-'83 Black Magic, and '83 Crimson Cat and optional on everything else. The Handling package was included/required/mandatory with the turbocharged four-cylinder and the eight-cylinders.

Both packages had their own specific struts and shocks, front and rear stabilizer bar diameters, and front and rear spring rates. I can list the specifics of each package's stabilizar bars diameters and spring rates, if need be. Each package had "slapper bar" (through mid-'84) or Quadra-Shock rear suspension (mid-'84 and later). The TR package also required/included forged metric aluminum ("TRX") wheels and Michelin TRX tires.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-05-2012, 10:18 PM
HBWaterfowler's Avatar
HBWaterfowler HBWaterfowler is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: America
Posts: 32
Arrow

Well I do have quad shocks, and a rear sway bar; Which wasn't common for that year, I believe. I'm sure when the CHP orders the SSP, it would come fully loaded in the suspension dept..
I could measure the sway bars and see if I can read some info on the shock/struts. Then post the data here for you to reference.

Thanks for the info.
__________________
-SSP Alternative
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-06-2012, 12:29 AM
FoxChassis FoxChassis is offline
VIN guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,011
Default

Rear sway bar was part of the Handling Package and TR Handling Package. Quadra-Shock rear suspension was part of the Handling Suspension package and TR Handling Package starting in mid '84. ALL Capri and Mustang coupes, convertibles, and hatchbacks with a 2.3T or 5.0L engine had the Handling Package.

The SSP had the same suspension parts that "civilian" 5.0L coupes (and convertibles and hatchbacks) had. SSPs did not get additional or "special" suspension parts.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-08-2012, 01:42 AM
HBWaterfowler's Avatar
HBWaterfowler HBWaterfowler is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: America
Posts: 32
Default

No TR package was the same, you could order it anyone you wanted.
The GT package had a standard list of parts. It was nothing that a civilian couldn't get, but did a civilian order it fully loaded with a ford service plan?
__________________
-SSP Alternative
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.